Sunday 11 August 2013

Movie Review: Chennai Express






Cast: Shah Rukh Khan, Deepika Padukone, Nikitin Dheer and Sathyaraj

Numerous Tamilians living in Mumbai often took the Madras Mail to the state of their origin in their childhood. The train stopped at nearly every station on the railway map before finally disgorging its exhausted passengers at the central terminus. Rohit Shetty’s new movie is titled Chennai Express but it is a bit like the Madras Mail—it chugs slowly and inexorably to its foregone conclusion.
The story, credited to K. Subhash, has tremendous unrealised potential to be a zippy and zany screwball comedy. Rahul (Shah Rukh Khan) is trying to duck out of his duty of immersing his recently departed grandfather’s ashes by taking a holiday in Goa. Instead, he gets embroiled in the affairs of Meena (Deepika Padukone), a Tamilian whose attempts to flee her wedding to a man of her father’s choice are foiled by her bulky and menacing relatives.
Through a series of circumstances that could have been funnier but aren’t, Rahul and Meena arrive in her Kumban village, where Meena passes off Rahul as her lover, earning the wrath of her stern gangster father (Sathyaraj). Attempted escapes and bonding sessions against a clearly Goan backdrop follow, leading to the inevitable exchange of lovelorn looks and the evolution of Rahul from wimp into hero.

There are moments of vim and wit spread over the 142-minute duration and mostly stacked in the beginning, when Shetty introduces the movie’s leitmotif of a clash of cultures between North and South. This clash turns out to be little more than a contest of differing languages and accents—the world doesn’t seem to have changed much since the days of Padosan. Meena mangles her Hindi, while her family and community members chatter away in Tamil, which is helpfully translated for the sake of Rahul and bewildered non-Tamilian viewers. The movie doesn’t have any equivalent of Anu Menon’s fictitious Lolakutty character, who entertained viewers of Channel [V] with her hilarious and perceptive witticisms about Malayaliness.
Social observation isn’t Shetty’s forte, to be sure, and is nigh impossible in a movie whose dialogue writers are the impoverished punsters Sajid-Farhad. Shetty does work hard to be true to the story setting. He packs the movie with a largely Tamilian cast, drawn from a pool of extras and television talent, although he squanders the potential of a seasoned actor like Sathyaraj. Tamil folk and film music influences can be heard on the soundtrack, while the choreography attempts to replicate the energy of song-and-dance sequences in Tamil movies. There’s even a “lungi dance” at the end to name-check Bollywood’s tribute to the reigning god of Tamil cinema, Rajinikanth, but the entire endeavour proves to be as ersatz as Padukone’s Tamil accent.
The fascination with—and accompanying exoticisation of—Tamil popular culture by a section of the Hindi movie business not just too silly to be offensive—it is proving to be an increasingly shallow exercise. Bollywood has built bridges with the Tamil and Telugu film industries in recent years, leading to several remakes, co-productions and a crossover of talent on all sides. Chennai Express is careful to maintain the healthy equation, but in the process, Shetty never lets it rip. He is content with doling out a festive season timepasser, which is the solo release for the Eid weekend and has been plastered across so many screens in the country and the world that its success is guaranteed. But since when did business smarts compensate for entertaining cinema? The inevitable journey to the bank is enlivened by Padukone’s luminosity and Khan’s enthusiastically over-the-top performance, which includes sending up his screen persona and periodically contorting his weathered face. Khan grins through the comic bits and grimaces through the romantic scenes, secure in the knowledge that he doesn’t need to try too hard to hit the jackpot. Everybody involved with this movie already has.

Saturday 10 August 2013

Elysium , Review 2


Rating: 6.5 out of 10
Movie Details: View here 

Cast:
Matt Damon as Max DeCosta
Jodie Foster as Secretary of Defense Delacourt
Sharlto Copley as Agent Kruger
Alice Braga as Frey
Diego Luna as Julio
Wagner Moura as Spider
William Fichtner as John Carlyle
Brandon Auret as Drake
Josh Blacker as Crowe
Emma Tremblay as Matilda
Fran Tahir as President Patel
Maxwell Perry Cotton as Young Max

Directed by Neill Blomkamp

Review:
Fans and creators of sci-fi love to talk about the power of the genre being in its ability to use analogy to depict our current, using its fantastic backdrop to push modern mores and conventional wisdom to extremes in order to test how accurate or worthwhile they really are. When done well it does work, but the problem with a message built on going to extremes is that extremes are very hard to make believable and very easy to get away from a storyteller for just that reason. Case in point: Neil Blomkamp's "Elysium," or what I like to call "When bad analogies happen to good filmmakers."

About a century from now rabid overpopulation has reduced much of the Earth to a third-world slum, with not enough food, medicine or hope to go around. The richest one percent, seeing this coming, have pooled their resources and built their own space station—Elysium—where they live in mostly ignorant luxury and indolence, leaving people like car-thief-gone-straight Max (Matt Damon) to fend for themselves.

Which is all well and good, as far as it goes. Blomkamp's visual creation of an Earth falling apart (focused, like any good Hollywood film should be, on the urban hell of Los Angeles) is a feast, telling you all you need to know about the world people like Max live in and why they would be willing to take their chances to attempt to fly up to Elysium on illegal shuttles in an attempt to partake of the wonders of civilization horded there. Wonders like medical beds that can instantly heal anything up to and including a grenade to the face.

And then the harsh Secretary of Defense (Jodie Foster), who seems at least partially based on Christine Lagarde, orders the ships full of illegals to be shot down on their way up and the film begins its long slow slide into ridiculousness.

Part of that is because Blomkamp obviously has a better feel for the down-trodden Earth he has created, partly because much of it is recreated from some of his previous shorts over the year's right down to the brutal obnoxious robot police force which for some reason has been programmed to act exactly like brutal obnoxious human police officers.

In fact, most of the downtrodden of Earth are treated at arm's length, when treated at all, by robots and mechanisms, built by the likes of billionaire John Carlyle (William Fichtner) who somehow manages to stay a billionaire by selling everything he makes to Elysium (which he built) seeing as the bulk of ‘consumers' live in abject poverty and can't possibly afford anything he makes.

For the most part though, little things like that can be forgiven, initially, as Blomkamp builds his world around Max, an everyman trying to stay on the straight and narrow. Then Max gets hit by a blast of deadly radiation and has only five days to live at which point nothing seems over the top to him, including getting bolted into a cybernetic exoskeleton and a computer drive inserted in his head if it will get him up to Elysium and one of the magic healing pods.

This is good and bad news. On the one hand it is when Blomkamp really gets into his action movie element as Max and a gang of ne'er-do-wells attempt to kidnap Carlyle and suddenly finds himself in the middle of a power struggle by Foster and her top goon (District 9's Sharlto Copley as a crazed super-soldier) who are attempting to reboot Elysium's computer in order to tell it she is the president in some sort of electronic coup [see she hates politicians but she's the Secretary of Defense in some sort of government which controls both Elysium, which seems to operate as its own country, and of the Earth itself and you know what I give up; the more "Elysium" explains, the less believable it gets].

This wouldn't be a big Hollywood action movie without a cute kid to spur the hero on, so naturally the daughter of Max's childhood friend (Alice Braga) is dying of cancer and needs to get up to Elysium, too. Max fights against his own heroic nature, and against Copley and his men, for as long as he can but in the end he is trapped in an action movie which means one thing. Showdown on the space station.

When the ham-handed socio-political commentary takes a breather, "Elysium" actually isn't a bad action movie, buoyed by a decent performance from Damon and some extremely well-put together set pieces from Blomkamp (though like with his previous films the best is saved for the very end and you've got to wait a while for it).

The problem is the better the dumb action movie elements get, the worse the smart commentary parts get, right up to the denouement where it is revealed that no citizen of Elysium can be arrested for anything, ever (just follow that train of thought to its logical conclusion). This would be, well not forgivable, but at least expected if "Elysium" were the dumb movie trying to look smart it pretends to be, but it's not. It's trying to be the opposite, a smart movie playing dumb in order to get its own point across and that incongruity will make your head explode, raining bloody giblets down on all of the people unfortunate enough to be sitting next to you.

Now, that all does sound much worse than "Elysium" really is – as a roller coaster it is pretty good fun and if that's all you want and/or you know or care nothing at all about the politics and policies surrounding the developing world it probably is one of the better film experiences you'll have in the theater this summer. But if you can't ignore the ham-handedness of the message, which moves quickly from not far off-base to way, way over the top, it might be just too much for you.

Elysium ,Review 1



Rating: 8 out of 10
Movie Details: View here 

Cast:
Matt Damon as Max
Jodie Foster as Delacourt
Sharlto Copley as Kruger
Alice Braga as Frey
Diego Luna as Julio
Wagner Moura as Spider
William Fichtner as John Carlyle
Brandon Auret as Drake
Josh Blacker as Crowe
Emma Tremblay as Matilda
Jose Pablo Cantillo as Sandro
Maxwell Perry Cotton as Young Max
Faran Tahir as President Patel
Adrian Holmes as Manuel
Jared Keeso as Rico

Directed by Neill Blomkamp

Summary:
Cool world-building and gritty sci-fi action make "Elysium" a film worth checking out for genre fans.

Story:
In the year 2154, the Earth has been ruined by pollution, population overcrowding, poverty, crime, and disease, but the wealthy class has found a solution by leaving Earth and living on a luxurious space station called Elysium. The rest of humanity must fight over the scraps left behind to survive on the planet.

Max grew up dreaming of living on Elysium along with his childhood friend Frey, but that dream disappeared as he fell into a life of crime. Now on probation, he is trying to straighten up his life even as he's harassed by police, bosses, and his former partners in crime.

When Max is exposed to a lethal dose of radiation in an industrial accident, he only has one hope for survival – Elysium. Medical machines there can save his life if he can manage to sneak onto the highly-guarded station. Max makes a deal with local crime lord and smuggler Spider to get there.

Spider forces him to be surgically attached to an exoskeleton that enhances his strength. But as Max soon discovers, there's a lot more at stake than his own personal health. The leaders of Elysium will do everything in their power to stop Max from accomplishing his mission.

"Elysium" is rated R for strong bloody violence and language throughout.

What Worked:
Neill Blomkamp is hitting the sweet spot of what I like each time. My movie tastes were formed by films like "Terminator," "Predator," "RoboCop" and "Aliens." They were all sci-fi stories with spectacular elements and gritty action, but they were still very much grounded in reality. That seems to be Blomkamp's forte and "Elysium" is another example of why.

One of my big problems with sci-fi is that they often have an unrealistic depiction of the future. They tend to show flying cars, lightspeed travel, and jetpacks only 20 years from now. "Elysium," set in 2154, shows technology and environments that are entirely believable for 140 years from now. Cybernetic implants are no more unusual than an iPhone. Flying ships capable of space flight are as common as everyday cars. Medical miracles are as ordinary as penicillin. Robots are as much of a nuisance as automated phone messages. But it's not all jetpacks and chrome in the future. Los Angeles is just as believable as a ruined hellhole as it is a futuristic Mecca. Division of the social classes is the same as it has been throughout the rest of history. And political conspiracies are as alive and well as they were in ancient Rome. Blomkamp, in his world building, has found the right balance between futuristic elements and the same familiar problems that have plagued mankind since the dawn of history. (Anybody saying this film promotes socialism needs to look back at thousands of years of stories about class warfare.) The end result is a great backdrop for a much more personal story about Max.

You could very easily take Max's story and put it in any time period. It's a story about a man trying to set his life right, both spiritually and physically, and Matt Damon sells it well. He makes a great everyman that is likable even though he has a criminal past. It doesn't hurt that he's also believable in the action scenes. And that is yet another trademark of Blomkamp – brutal sci-fi action. Every time a character grabs a gun, you wonder what creative and spectacular way the target will no doubt gorily die. It's like a Cracker Jack box of sci-fi carnage.

Damon is supported by a relatively small supporting cast. Alice Braga plays Frey, his childhood friend and love interest. The two have good chemistry on the screen. Diego Luna also plays Julio, Max's partner in crime. Like Damon, he's likable despite his criminal lifestyle. Then there's Wagner Moura as Spider, the crime lord that Max must make a deal with. He sets the events in motion for the story and becomes a bigger and bigger player as the story progresses. Finally, there is Sharlto Copley as Kruger. Few actors could play a pencil pusher (like in "District 9") and a psychotic trained killer equally convincingly, but Copley does it well. I never doubted for a moment that he was a cold-blooded, cyborg mercenary.

What Didn't Work:
As far as the story goes, there weren't all that many surprises. The trailers told me most of the plot and it wasn't hard to fill in the rest. Fortunately the world is exciting enough to be immersed in that it made the trip to space and back worthwhile. It also seemed unusual that early in the film, Elysium is portrayed as an impenetrable fortress. Then, by the end, people come and go from it with relative ease and there only seems to be a skeleton security force on the station. For a film otherwise firmly grounded in realism, it felt unrealistic.

My next complaint is something I never expected to complain about – the accents. I work with people from China, Korea, the UK, Greece, India, Malaysia, and Mexico on a daily basis. I have no problem listening to foreign accents. Yet as Spider and Kruger spoke, more than once I had a hard time understanding what they were saying. Copley's accent, for the most part, is pretty cool, but I think he does lay it on a bit thick. At one point when he said "wife" like "woyf," I heard several chuckles in the audience during an otherwise serious scene. But the worst accent in the film belongs to Jodie Foster as Delacourt. She seems to be channeling Martha Stewart as she speaks. We're so familiar with her real voice that when she tries to vary it, it comes across poorly. I wish she had simply played the role with her everyday accent because it would have been less distracting.

The Bottom Line:
People have been saying the "District 9" is better than "Elysium" and I would agree with them, but "Elysium" should still please any fans of sci-fi or Matt Damon. It's a nice dose of gritty sci-fi to the summer movie lineup.

Disney's Planes ,Review



Rating: 5.5 out of 10
Movie Details: View here 

Cast:
Dane Cook as Dusty Crophopper (voice)
Stacy Keach as Skipper (voice)
Brad Garrett as Chug (voice)
Teri Hatcher as Dottie (voice)
Julia Louis-Dreyfus as Rochelle (voice)
Priyanka Chopra as Ishani (voice)
John Cleese as Bulldog (voice)
Cedric the Entertainer as Leadbottom (voice)
Carlos Alazraqui as El Chupacabra / Additional Voices (voice)
Roger Craig Smith as Ripslinger / Additional Voices (voice)
Anthony Edwards as Echo (voice)
Val Kilmer as Bravo (voice)
Sinbad as Roper (voice)
Gabriel Iglesias as Ned / Zed (voice)
Brent Musburger as Brent Mustangburger (voice)

Directed by Klay Hall

Summary:
"Planes" has some cool flying animation and should please children, but the unoriginal plot and bland characters make it pretty forgettable for adults.

Story:
Set in the world of "Cars," "Planes" features Dusty Crophopper, a crop dusting plane that dreams of one day becoming a racer. Determined and optimistic, nothing gets this plane down… except his fear of extreme heights. Through skill and good fortune, Dusty manages to qualify for a race around the world, but he's going to need to get over his fear of heights if he has any hope of winning the race. He might just do it with the help of his friends including an old WWII fighter by the name of Skipper. Dusty will need the experienced plane's expertise if he's going to defeat the reigning champion Ripslinger.

"Planes" is rated PG for some mild action and rude humor.

What Worked:
For me, the highlight of "Planes" was the 3D animation. It worked quite well as the airplanes flew in and out of the screen and they gave you a first person view as Dusty flew through canyons, between trees, and around other obstacles. The end result is a film that makes the most of the big screen medium.

While much of the film was rather bland, a couple of scenes did stand out. The first was when El Chupacabra, in an attempt to woo the Canadian plane Rochelle, starts singing "Love Machine" with a blaring boom box. But then Dusty helps him and he ends up singing a great acoustic version of the song along with a Mariachi band. It turns into an unexpected and fun musical moment. Another scene features a flashback by Skipper to his WWII days. We see him and his squadron in a rather brutal air battle against some ships in the Pacific. It was an unexpected moment in an otherwise 'safe' movie with no surprises. I probably could have watched an entire film of nothing but the WWII planes.

While there are no bonus scenes in the credits, there is a logo for the upcoming "Planes: Fire and Rescue." So if you or your kids liked this film, you'll be glad to see that.

What Didn't Work:
The big problem with "Planes" is that it feels completely phoned in. Other than the fact that it features living airplanes, there is no other novelty to this story. It's your typical underdog sports story with all of the usual clichés and it is utterly predictable. You can look at the movie poster and trailer and figure out the entire plot of this film. It's that by the numbers.

Besides the familiar plot, none of the characters are real standouts. Dane Cook was perfectly adequate as Dusty Crophopper, but anybody could have played the role and done an equivalent job. All of the other characters are similarly dull which is a surprise considering the cast includes Stacy Keach, Brad Garrett, Julia Louis-Dreyfus and John Cleese. They even have a fun "Top Gun"-themed cameo by Val Kilmer and Anthony Edwards, but you don't even realize it was them until the credits rolled. Overall, it does not feel like the cast was used to their full potential.

The Bottom Line:
I'm sure "Planes" will make Disney a lot of money and kids under 10 will love it. And while it is severely lacking in many respects, there are a lot worse films that parents could sit through. "Planes," fortunately, is tolerable.

Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters, review 2


Rating: 6.5 out of 10
Movie Details: View here 

Cast:
Logan Lerman as Percy Jackson
Brandon T. Jackson as Grover Underwood
Alexandra Daddario as Annabeth Chase
Leven Rambin as Clarisse La Rue
Jake Abel as Luke Castellan
Anthony Stuart Head as Chiron
Stanley Tucci as Dionysus
Nathan Fillion as Hermes
Douglas Smith as Tyson
Robert Maillet as Polyphemus
Missi Pyle, Yvette Nicole Brown and Mary Birdsong as The Graeae

Directed by Thor Freudenthal

Review:
With a complete change in creative personnel, and adjusted expectations, "Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters" is a noticeable improvement over the first "Percy Jackson" adventure, but it's still awkward and unsure of itself like the teenagers it purports to be about. And still doomed to continue living in Harry Potter's shadow.

That's not entirely "Percy's" fault. Some of it is the compelling nature of the Hero's Journey archetype, which invites imitation, and some of it is the desire among film executives to keep making films for teenage boys about finding your place in the world and developing agency over your own life, over and over again, under the assumption audiences have the memory and attention span of gold fish.

Which is all fine and dandy the first time out, but once you start making sequels you have to confront the reality that you've covered that ground already and doing it again will just be repetitive and boring. To their credit, the "Sea of Monsters" filmmakers resist the urge to shrug, say they don't care about that, attempting to advance the characters as much as they can within the trap of the youth-oriented effects film.

Among other things, that gives us a markedly more likeable Logan Lerman as Percy himself. Not only is he a better actor now than he was three years ago, Percy himself has aged and matured as well. Though still frustrated over the lack of communication with his father, the sea god Poseidon (played by Sir Not Appearing In This Movie), much of the teenage angst of the first film has been left behind, giving us a Percy more confident in his abilities and his place in the world of Camp Half-blood.

Or he would be if he wasn't continually being shown up by Clarisse (Leven Rambin), daughter of Ares, whose more evolved killer instincts begin to foster doubts in Percy about his abilities as a hero. Doubts he'll have to face when the magic shield which protects the camp and its inhabitants from monsters threatens to fall, forcing Percy and his co-horts to go on a quest for the legendary Golden Fleece which may be able to heal the magic tree which casts the shield and save the camp.

Which happens pretty quickly in this much more action-oriented sequel. With all the set-up of the world out of the way in the first film, new director Thor Freudenthal ("Diary of a Wimpy Kid") is free to jump right into the adventure itself; and jump he does with introducing several new characters including Clarisse and Percy's one-eyed half-brother Tyson (Douglas Smith) and a fight with a giant mechanical bull, right off the bat.

In fact, "Sea of Monsters" spends quite a bit of time introducing and developing new characters and their relationships with Percy, pushing returning players like Alexandra Daddario's Annabeth and Brandon Jackson's Grover to the sidelines. Grover himself disappears from the film fairly early on and does not reappear again until the last act, while much of Annabeth's feistiness has been transferred to Clarisse, offering her little to do but get pushed around and grouse about how much she distrusts Tyson.

It seems years earlier when she and Grover were young children--as opposed to near thirty-year-olds … I mean … teenagers--they were attacked by a band of Cyclops on their way to Camp Half-blood, saved only by the sacrifice of their friend Thalia, daughter of Zeus, whose sacrifice resulted in the tree which protects the camp in the present day.

This will all be very important later on, and by later on I mean in a third Percy Jackson film which is continually teased throughout "Sea of Monsters" to the point of becoming a little distracting (and which will require the stars of the film to be teachers at the Camp instead of students by the time they get to it at the rate they've been going).

There is a prophecy, you see, that the human child of one of the three Great Gods (Zeus, Hades and Poseidon) would either save or destroy Olympus by his 20th birthday, and young Percy is the only one fitting that bill, causing him to regress somewhat to worrying about his destiny and ability to chose his own path in life through much of the film (and I assume through a third film if they actually make it).

That's something Luke (Jake Abel), son of Hermes, would happily like to see come to pass as he returns to both antagonize Percy again and prove that he is the better actor of the two and would probably have made a better star than Lerman. Though he has gotten more self-assured as an actor, Lerman continues to spend most of his time getting upstaged by more flamboyant personalities, like Nathan Fillion's Hermes, who seems to be channeling Alec Baldwin from "30 Rock."

That said, "Sea of Monsters" is still a genuine improvement over the tepid "Lightning Thief." Freudenthal and screenwriter Marc Guggenheim ("Green Lantern") have pushed aside any supporting characters not directly related to the goings on, creating a more focused narrative. Combined with a better sense of Percy as a character, and actually attempting to grow him as a person, results in a noticeably better film.

"Percy" is still, however, its own worst enemy. It's difficult to make a move for the juvenile without becoming juvenile--it's a balance filmmakers fight and lose against all the time--and "Sea of Monsters" bounces around that line quite a bit. Unfortunately, neither Freudenthal nor Guggeheim is particularly good at being whimsical and the attempts at levity or comically showing the godly world inside the real one fall hopelessly flat.

Still, the fact that they were able to improve so much from the first film shows there's life in the "Percy Jackson" boat yet. Yeah, it's still living under a big, lightning bolt shaped shadow, but there's room to grow and at least some desire to attempt it. Here's hoping they make that third film after all.

Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters, review 1



Rating: 5.5 out of 10
Movie Details: View here 

Cast:
Logan Lerman as Percy Jackson
Alexandra Daddario as Annabeth
Douglas Smith as Tyson
Leven Rambin as Clarisse
Brandon T. Jackson as Grover
Jake Abel as Luke
Anthony Head as Chiron
Stanley Tucci as Mr. D
Connor Dunn as Tereus
Paloma Kwiatkowski as Thalia
Nathan Fillion as Hermes

Directed by Thor Freudenthal

Summary:
"Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters" has a few fun action sequences, but weak characters and plot leave it with little to offer to anyone over 12.

Story:
“Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters” is based on the novel by Rick Riordan.

Sometime after the first film, Percy Jackson and his friends continue to train at the camp for demigods. But Percy's starting to doubt himself, especially as rival Clarisse goes out of her way to bully him. Maybe saving Olympus was just a fluke? And maybe he has to rely on his friends since he may have no real talent of his own?

Percy's doubt is interrupted when the camp is attacked and the magical tree that generates its protective barrier is sickened. The attack is led by Luke who, it turns out, wasn't killed in the first film. As the magical tree begins to die, Percy and his friends discover that the only thing that may save it is the Golden Fleece located in the Sea of Monsters (i.e. the Bermuda Triangle). But Percy, Grover, Annabeth, and Percy's newly discovered cyclops half-brother Tyson will have to risk life and limb to recover it.

"Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters" is rated PG for fantasy action violence, some scary images and mild language

What Worked:
The best thing in "Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters" is easily the action. It's a lot of fun to see monsters from Greek mythology terrorizing our heroes in modern settings. You see a mechanical bull destroy the demigod camp, a massive sea creature devour ships, an attacking giant Cyclops, and more. It was the highlight of the first film and it remains the highlight of the sequel. Combine that action with some pretty good 3D and you have a mildly entertaining popcorn flick.

The cameos are another highlight of the latest Percy Jackson film. Nathan Fillion appears as Hermes and provides some much needed comic relief. He throws yet another modern twist on Greek mythology by playing a UPS executive (Get it? He's the messenger of the gods.) Stanley Tucci also has a small role as Mr. D, or the god Dionysus, the god of wine. He's one of the headmasters of the demigod school and has some fun interaction with Percy and the crew while he rocks yet another impressive wig. Tucci does look a tad like Ron Jeremy which is unsettling, but I think that’s what he was going for.

I took my two young sons to this film. Only the older one had read the books, but both were quite happy with the movie. I must admit that I was looking for something more substantial, but if I was going to have to sit through a movie geared for kids, this at least kept me somewhat engaged.

What Didn't Work:
While "Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters" does have some highlights, it is ultimately quite bland. Percy is kind of dull as a character on the hero's journey. Grover, the main comic relief of the first film, is largely absent from this sequel. Conflict with Annabeth is now substituted by conflict with Clarisse, and she's largely unlikable. And the new Cyclops half brother Tyson is simply a mild-mannered oaf with little depth. Combine the bland characters with a very basic plot and you have a story that serves little purpose other than linking action scenes together.

The first movie was compared to Harry Potter a lot. And while that was OK on the first outing, nothing is done to distance it from the Potterverse in the sequel. In fact, it seems more like a Harry Potter rip-off now. You have the obvious comparisons between the demigod camp and Hogwarts. You have ineffective adult instructors. You have the trio of teens breaking the rules to go on a quest to save the school. You even have a magical taxicab that draws obvious comparisons to the knight bus in Harry Potter. These increasing numbers of similarities make it all seem very familiar and very done to death.

As fun as some of the special effects were, some of them just made you question why they even bothered. Hermes carries a staff with a couple of bickering CG animated snakes. They're painful to listen to but thankfully short-lived. The other scene with the Gray Sisters and the taxicab was also incredibly overdone and, as previously described, unoriginal. The witches are played by Yvette Nicole Brown (from "Community"), Missi Pyle, and Mary Birdsong, but their talents are not put to good use here. Later in the film, Clarisse captains a Civil War era steam ship crewed by zombies that is actually pretty cool. But the zombies are so unthreatening that you can't help but think a great opportunity was missed. (And why are there zombies in a movie about Greek mythology? Surely there was another option!) Anyway, the movie is filled with hits and misses and these are some of the misses.

The Bottom Line:
I'd only recommend "Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters" to fans of the book and anyone 12 and under. Parents will find it tolerable family fare if you have to entertain the kiddies over the summer, but it is overall pretty forgettable.

We're the Millers


Reviewed by: Edward Douglas
Rating: 8 out of 10
Movie Details: View here 

Cast: 
Jason Sudeikis as David Clark
Jennifer Aniston as Rose O'Reilly
Will Poulter as Kenny Rossmore
Emma Roberts as Casey Mathis
Ed Helms as Brad Gurdlinger
Nick Offerman as Don Fitzgerald
Kathryn Hahn as Edie Fitzgerald
Molly C. Quinn as Melissa Fitzgerald 
Tomer Sisley as Pablo Chacon
Matthew Willig as One-Eye
Luis Guzmán as Mexican Cop
Thomas Lennon as Rick Nathanson
Mark L. Young as Scottie P.
Ken Marino as Todd - Strip Club Owner
Laura-Leigh as Kymberly

Directed by Rawson Marshall Thurber

Story:
Small-time drugdealer David Clark (Jason Sudekis) has gotten himself into a fix with his distributor (Ed Helms) and is forced to travel down to Mexico to act as a mule to bring back a large shipment of marijuana. Realizing what would happen if he gets caught at the border, Clark recruits Rose (Jennifer Aniston), a stripper who lives in his building, to act as his wife and a couple of kids to help create the illusion of them being a family on an innocent vacation to Mexico. What could possibly go wrong?

Analysis:
With any comedy, whether it's good or bad, high concept or low brow, there's usually a point where you can figure out where it's going, or at least you think you do, and in the case of "We're the Millers," that point comes fairly early on, literally the moment drugdealer David Clark meets one of his married friends on the street and for a brief second ponders what it would be like to have his own family. That moment is fleeting, because Dave is a fairly selfish guy, basically just wanting to continue selling pot and making money. When he's robbed by some street kids, Dave's forced into take a risky job smuggling drugs across the Mexican border and comes up with the brilliant idea of pulling together a group of similarly-damaged individuals to pretend they're a family on vacation. 

As with any journey or road comedy, the things you see while traveling to your destination are often far more memorable and "We're the Millers" is so irreverently and consistently funny that it's easily forgiven for telegraphing its motives so early on. Once the set-up is readily out of the way in the first 15 or 20 minutes, you're quickly pulled into the idea of this mismatched foursome trying to pass themselves off as a makeshift suburban family and that's where the movie generally offer the most laughs as they pile into an RV full of marijuana and try to drive it across the border. 

Much of the reason why the movie works is due to how well Jason Sudeikis has honed what he does to the point where he can make anything he says funny rather than just relying on written jokes, as he seemingly is able to tap into an unlimited resource of ad-libs and asides that keeps things moving at a good pace. Regardless of whether you're a fan of Jennifer Aniston's or not, there's no denying she has a way of committing to a role like the smart stripper Rose that really works well with what Sudeikis does, but the real standout has to be "Son of Rambow" star Will Poulter, who actually plays off his awkward teens so well as the virginal Kenny that he becomes the heart of the movie. 

"Dodgeball" director Rawson Thurber's return to comedy proves to be a welcome one as he creates a great space for his cast, knowing exactly how much room to give them to play up each scene for the best laughs. The movie never gives you much of a chance to tire of the dynamics between the core foursome, since they're constantly being thrown into situations with new characters, whether it's Luiz Guzman's Mexican cop looking for a bribe or the movie's biggest scene stealers, Nick Offerman and Kathryn Hahn, who take things so far and beyond as a couple the family meets on their trip one might wonder whether a spin-off movie might be in order. The movie's only real weak point in terms of casting is Ed Helms' portrayal of Dave's wealthy but shady supplier who we cut back to every once in a while to see what sort of indulgences he's up to. It probably was an easy gig for Helms but not a particularly well-developed character.

The problem with many comedies these days is trying to keep some surprises for the actual movie and in the case of "We're the Millers," a lot of the major beats and situations have been used to sell the movie in trailers and commercials. Fortunately, there are more than a few moments that end up being even funnier in the movie as well as one particularly hilarious moment that you won't see coming. 

Eventually we're back on track to the story and you'll already have guessed that the Mexican cartel eventually catches up with the family, Aniston takes off her clothes to distract them, and the action starts to pick up. The last act might not offer too many surprises for the astute who already know the general formula for these kinds of movies, but things are generally pulled together in a satisfying way. And even with the amount of foul language and jokes about anal sex, there's still a fairly heartwarming message at the film's core where it never feels as mean or snarky as other similar movies, and that's a very hard thing to do indeed.

The Bottom Line:
There isn't a ton of heavy thinking involved with the high concept premise behind "We're the Millers," but it works better than one might expect and ultimately it's a winning comedy that leaves you wanting to see more of the Millers.

Sunday 4 August 2013

The Spectacular Now review



Reviewed by: Edward Douglas
Rating: 7.5 out of 10
Movie Details: View here 

Cast:
Miles Teller as Sutter Keely
Shailene Woodley as Aimee Finicky
Mary Elizabeth Winstead as Holly Keely
Jennifer Jason Leigh as Sutter's mother
Brie Larson as Cassidy
Kyle Chandler as Sutter's father
Dayo Okeniyi as Marcus
Kaitlyn Dever as Krystal
Bob Odenkirk
Andre Royo
Masam Holden as Ricky
Gary Weeks as Joe

Directed by James Ponsoldt

Story:
High school senior Sutter Keely (Miles Teller) is the life of every party he attends, but after breaking up with his similarly fun-loving girlfriend Cassidy (Brie Larson), he has trouble finding direction until he meets Aimee Finicky (Shailene Woodley), who is very different from the girls he's normally interested in. At first, she helps him with his geometry homework but they soon begin to bond, while everyone around them thinks Sutter is eventually going to break her heart.

Analysis:
Director James Ponsoldt's quick follow-up to last year's drinking dramedy "Smashed" is adapted from Tim Tharp's novel by no less than the writers of "(500) Days of Summer" and while the movie does have a character with a drinking problem as a common thread, it's a very different type of movie otherwise.

Miles Teller plays Sutter Keely, a constantly-drinking high school senior who has so much confidence and charm--much of it coming from his ever-present flask of alcohol--that everyone at school loves him, or at least that's what he thinks. We meet him as he's breaking up with his long-time girlfriend Cassidy (Brie Larson, who seems to be in every movie at SXSW this year) although he's handling it fairly well. Much of Sutter's problems come from having not grown up with his father, who was kicked out of the house over nine years prior, and his general attitude and drinking can mostly be traced back to that. After one such drinking binge he meets Aimee (Shailene Woodley), a brainy girl serious about her studies who agrees to help with his geometry. 

Who knows what he sees in her, but whether or not you believe this relationship and how it evolves will play a large part in whether or not you buy into the movie since so much revolves around the sweet and fairly innocent romance. 

In Sutter Keely, Miles Teller creates a character that traverses the line between his more comedic sidekick roles and the drama he displayed in "Rabbit Hole," proving that he's the real deal, while Shailene Woodley ("The Descendants") is well cast as Aimee, still feeling as fresh-faced and unjaded as an actress, and her and Teller have real chemistry which allows you to be pulled into their relationship as we watch Healy being changed by Aimee's good influence.

You have to give Ponsoldt some credit for getting strong and naturalistic performances out of the entire cast, which is rounded out by Jennifer Jason Leigh as Sutter's beleaguered single mother and Mary Elizabeth Winstead (from "Smashed") in a very different and significantly smaller role as his sister.

Because the movie isn't a straight comedy, you always feel like it's eventually going to get dark or something bad's going to happen and that tonal shift happens when Sutter decides to go find his father, taking Aimee along with him. That elusive figure in Sutter's life is played by Kyle Chandler, looking very different than we normally have seen him, partially because of his growth of stubble, but also the way he carries himself. Sutter's father has really gone downhill since leaving his family and is a classic lowlife f*ck-up whose drinking has taken him to a point where we could easily see Sutter ending up if he doesn't straighten out soon.

The movie certainly looks and feels very different from "Smashed" and that may partially be due to its literary background because it really feels like it comes from a book rather than Ponsoldt having the freedom to break away from the source material. The problem is that the movie just motors along for so much of its 95-minute running time without too many high points, and the musical choices aren't as inspired as other similar movies, something that could have really helped put the film over the top emotionally or made some of those scenes more memorable.

That's partially what makes "The Spectacular Now" a very good movie with a couple of nice moments rather than a great movie, although it does leave you with a lot to ruminate over and an incredibly moving ending.

2 Guns review



Reviewed by: Edward Douglas
Rating: 8 out of 10
Movie Details: View here 

Cast:
Denzel Washington as Robert 'Bobby' Trench
Mark Wahlberg as Marcus 'Stig' Stigman
Paula Patton as Deb
Bill Paxton as Earl
Fred Ward as Admiral Tuwey
James Marsden as Quince
Edward James Olmos as Papi Greco
Robert John Burke as Jessup
Greg Sproles as Chief Lucas
Patrick Fischler as Dr. Ken
Edgar Arreola as Rudy (Papi's Men)
Derek Solorsano as Ferret Nose Julio
Kyle Russell Clements as Teemo (Papi's Men)
Christopher Matthew Cook as Thick (Papi's Men)
Tim Bell as Lean (Papi's Men)

Directed by Baltasar Kormákur

Story:
"Bobby Beans" and "Stig" Stigman (Denzel Washington, Mark Wahlberg) have been working undercover together to take down a Mexican drug cartel, culminating in them robbing a bank holding their money. Confused by the amount of money being kept at the bank, $43 million, the two guys then discover that they're both hiding secrets from each other and there's a lot more going on with everyone they thought they could trust. 

Analysis:
Every once in a while, Hollywood delivers a late summer surprise, a movie that's such a no-brainer, easy-to-sell high concept that you think it can't offer anything beyond the usual shoot 'em ups and explosions. From the trailers and commercials you might expect "2 Guns," loosely based on a graphic novel of the same name, to be an hour and 45 minutes of its stars Denzel Washington and Mark Wahlberg clowning around, shooting at people and blowing things up--and it has all of that--but at its core, it's actually a fairly clever and complex crime thriller that keeps you guessing every step of the way. Maybe it's no surprise since the original source material came from the mind of Steven Grant, an underrated comic book vet who knows how to write solid crime comics.

The movie opens at a diner where two guys are arguing about their breakfast, but soon it becomes obvious that they're more interested in the bank across the street. Cut to a week earlier where the two of them are traveling down to Mexico to meet with the head of the drug cartel, Edward James Olmos' Papi Greco, to negotiate a bust. We don't know at the time that one of them is a DEA Agent but they plan on hitting the cartel where it hurts, the money it has stashed at the bank we saw earlier. It turns out that Stigman is a Naval Intelligence Officer, which might make you wonder why the Navy would want to rob millions from the Mexican cartel, but it's something that's explained and it adds to the many twists we won't reveal.

It makes for a surprisingly good character piece for both Denzel and Wahlberg in which they get to play with roles not too far from what we've seen from them before but with nice personality trait twists. With gold teeth in place, Washington plays up his undercover role but easily switches to being a serious DEA agent when he's with his supervisors. By comparison, Wahlberg goes for his bright-eyed nice guy over the straight-edged tough guy, but Stigman has the shooting skills to back up his motormouth. When on screen together, the two of them banter with quick sharply written patter, but the movie does separate them for a while as they deal with their own people trying to distance themselves from their now rogue agents. Still, they're best when on screen together, whether they're arguing or helping each other out in a firefight, which leads to many solid memorable sequences between them.

Even so, this isn't your typical buddy comedy and there's a lot going on in terms of what is really going on, all of which slowly unfolds over the second act as the two unlikely partners find out exactly who they're dealing with and how deep they are in over their heads. It also gets fairly serious and dramatic at times as the stakes get higher, allowing Washington to break out of the more humorous role we see him playing as the movie opens.

The results come off like a somewhat tamer version of Joe Carnahan's "Smokin' Aces" with cool characters and action set pieces that even delves into Coen Brothers territory with a character straight out of "No Country for Old Men" in Bill Paxton's Earl, an enforcer sent to get back the $43 million using unconventional tactics. The main duo generally have a great supporting cast around them, including Paula Patton as Bobby's handler and sometimes squeeze, who gives a fearless performance as literally the only woman in the movie other than a couple of waitresses and bank tellers. Edward James Olmos also gets in on the fun chewing up scenery as the drug kingpin Papi and getting some great revenge on the guys who robbed him.

"2 Guns" is also a definitive step forward for Icelandic filmmaker Baltasar Kormákur from his last Hollywood movie "Contraband," which retained the grim and grey colors of his native work, showing off some flashy and impressive set pieces such as a climactic Mexican stand-off--literally in Mexico--that includes a massive bull stampede. This one also looks brighter and more slick with a fantastic score by Clinton Shorter that goes miles to keep things light and upbeat, giving it just the right flair of being a Western as well as a crime flick. 

The Bottom Line:
Denzel, Wahlberg, Kormakur and their solid supporting cast deliver a surprisingly fun action comedy that makes "2 Guns" the type of movie you can enjoy in the moment but also one that’s likely to play just as well on repeat viewings.

Saturday 3 August 2013

The World's End



Reviewed by: Edward Douglas
Rating: 7.5 out of 10

Movie Details: View here 

Cast:
Simon Pegg as Gary King
Martin Freeman as Oliver
Nick Frost as Andrew Knightley
Eddie Marsan as Peter
Paddy Considine as Steven
Rosamund Pike as Sam
David Bradley as Basil
Angie Wallis as Peter's Wife
Thomas Law as Young Gary
Zachary Bailess as Young Andy
James Tarpey as Young Peter
Jasper Levine as Young Steven
Luke Bromley as Teenage Oliver

Directed by Edgar Wright 

Story:
While best friends in high school, Gary, Andy, Oliver, Peter and Steven spent one night doing a pub crawl of 12 local pubs on the "Miracle Mile" of their small town of Newton Haven—they never finished it. 20 years later, Gary King (Simon Pegg) wants them to reunite to complete the crawl they gave up on as kids. Unfortunately, all his friends are now mature adults with wives and families and jobs and they want nothing to with Gary's quest, but he convinces them to reunite with a lie with his former best friend Andrew (Nick Frost) still angry about an incident that happened which drove a wedge in their friendship.

Analysis:
Simon Pegg, Nick Frost and director Edgar Wright have created quite a cottage market of British comedy for themselves with the show "Spaced" and two wildly-acclaimed movies in "Shaun of the Dead" and "Hot Fuzz." The question going into "The World's End"--an idea they've had since the "Hot Fuzz" days--is whether after six years, the trio are able to recreate the magic of their earlier movies, especially having moved onto other things in between their collaborations. Fortunately, they have a great premise that fits in with the themes of the other two movies, essentially everyday people dealing with other-worldly occurrences and they've surrounded the proven pairing of Pegg and Frost with another solid British cast.

While "Shaun" played with the archetypes of George Romero zombie movies and "Hot Fuzz" did the same for Michael Bay buddy cop movies, "The World's End" is really its own thing, though it does feel more like an ensemble piece than those movies with Martin Freeman, Eddie Marsan and Paddy Considine being as big a part of the story as Pegg and Frost. Essentially, the film opens with Gary in an AA meeting telling the story of the pub crawl and being convinced that finishing it might offer the closure he needs, so he revisits all his old friends, all of whom are happy and successful in their lives. Somehow he manages to convince them to begrudgingly return to Newton Haven where all but Andy--now sober for 16 years--try to humor Gary. Things only really start moving about thirty minutes in when the friends realize there's something wrong with the townspeople - something we won't go into too much detail about though it does offer some fun creatures that wouldn't have been out of place in '70s era "Doctor Who." 

Gary King is the only one of the friends who hasn't really grown up or changed since the friends were last together, still living in the past with the same car he drove back then. He's actually a great character for Pegg to play, not too far removed from Shaun or other characters but just different enough from some of the other things he's done, both with Wright and without, to make him just the right fit. Frost plays it so straight-laced for most of the movie, bringing a lot of the drama to the story as he is still smarting from an incident decades earlier where a drugged-out Gary rolled a car putting him in the hospital for months. Frost's fans will probably be more thrilled when he gets into the action and later when he spouts a few one-liners more in-line with his characters from "Shaun" and "Hot Fuzz," since that's what most of the fans will be waiting for.

Even so, neither of them is quite as funny as a drunken giggling Eddie Marsan while the other two--Martin Freeman and Paddy Considine--both play it straighter even though they have some funny lines and get in just as much on the action. Rosamund Pike shows up as a mutual love interest of Steve and Gary's although she quickly disappears and feels like another wasted female character in a summer full of them. 

The action sequences are so much fun you'll probably quickly set aside the question "How are all these businessmen so adept at martial arts moves?" and just go along with it, although it is quite a jarring change in tone and direction for those enjoying the buddy comedy aspect of the movie. Things start getting somewhat surreal when they arrive at a pub where they seem to be holding some sort of school disco and three of the friends are seduced by three of the girls from high school who haven't gotten older due to the alien tampering. 

Whlie Wright uses many of his distinctive directing trademarks, this isn't the fast cut joke a minute movie that was "Hot Fuzz," instead feeling more like other standard comedies just with a stronger plot and characters yet not feeling the need to fill every frame with a gag. In some ways, it feels like the script just isn't nearly as well developed as some of those other movies maybe because they were all doing other things.

The other thing that didn't quite work this time was the soundtrack with Wright mostly using British hits from the early '90s by Primal Scream, Happy Mondays and others. They're great tunes for sure, but the music in Wright's previous movies always added another clever level to the humor in some way and that's sorely missing. 

Where things start to go really wrong is when the movie cuts to an odd flash forward epilogue that's such a strange departure from the tone of the rest of the movie that it takes you out of what you've just seen and not everyone will be on board with it.

The Bottom Line:
"The World's End" is a very different movie from its predecessors, feeling almost like two movies in one, and as much as the genre elements offer some fun action and jokes, it's hard not to feel that the movie would have worked just as well with the six actors doing a straight pub crawl without all that. It's still funnier than 90% of the comedies you're likely to see this summer but maybe fashioning it as a trilogy with "Shaun of the Dead" and "Hot Fuzz" wasn't a great idea since it leads to comparisons it can't possibly live up to being such a different movie.